Issues and concerns in pro poor community based cattle breeding program in Bulilimamangwe district of Zimbabwe
Keywords:
Community based, Cattle breeding, Small scale, ZimbabweAbstract
Cattle rearing plays a crucial role in the semi arid communal areas of Zimbabwe, as a result any developmental strategy that is aimed at improving household livelihood in these areas should target cattle production. The objective of the study was to assess the impact of introducing improved indigenous cattle beef breeds in Bulilima District of Matabeleland South in Zimbabwe. The study was carried out in Masendu ward comprising of six villages of Luvuluma, Mambo, Tjeboroma, Makumbi, Thandawani and Muke. A random sample of 13 livestock farmers were selected from participants of the Kellogg Foundation communal areas indigenous cattle (Tuli, Afrikaner and Nguni) improvement program through a donation of improved indigenous beef cattle bulls. Semi-structured questionnaires were used to collect data on household demographics, socioeconomic factors, herd structure, management practices and constraints in cattle breeding program. Qualitative data were coded and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 2008) computer software in order to generate descriptive statistics such as means and frequencies or percentages. The study revealed an interesting scenario on household demographics; the majority of the farmers had formal education, with only 7.7% not having attained any formal education. As a result of Kellogg Foundation bull donations some farmers (15.4%) increased their herd size to more than 30 cattle which improved their social status in the areas. Farmers interviewed showed that they were motivated to keep improved breeds with least more than half of the farmers reporting that the bulls to a certain extent increased the number of cows serviced within the community herds. Poor animal condition was reported in cattle herds due to the inadequate supply of both water and nutrition, the latter being caused by lack of good grazing. It was noted that government support was necessary in infrastructure development in order to improve community based cattle breeding programs. The need to organise market to encourage smallholder farmers to sell their animals was also cited. There was a belief that better prices were achievable at local markets if the communal herd was genetically improved for important economic traits. Therefore, the key conclusion was that communal farmers had a positive perception on improving the communal cattle herds. This warranted a multi-sectoral approach to address different challenges that militate against high cattle productivity in communal areas.
References
Agrisystems, 2000. National livestock development study for Zimbabwe. Draft main report. Phase 1. Harare,
Zmbabwe. Agrisystems Ltd, and Pricewaterhouse Coopers.
Assan, N., 2012. Genetic improvement and utilization of indigenous cattle breeds for beef production in
Zimbabwe: past, present and future prospects. Sci. J. Agr., (2012)1(1)1-13.
Assan, N., 2014. Gender disparities in livestock production and their implications for livestock productivity in
Africa. Sci. J. Anim. Sci., 3(5), 126- 138.
Aynale, H., Ayalew, W., Kebede, N., Dessie, T., Tegegne, A., 2011. Breeding strategy to improve Ethiopian Boran
cattle for meat and milk production. IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers
Project Working Paper 26. Nairobi, Kenya, ILRI.
Bester, J., Matjuda, L.E., Rust, J.M., Fourie, H.J., 2001. The Nguni: A Case Study, Proceedings of International
Symposium “Managing Biodiversity in agricultural Ecosystems”, Montreal, Canada.
Bhosale, S., 2010. Traits of Economic Importance inDairy and Beefe Breeds of cattle Breeds. In Cattle Ppt
Presentation 15 September 2010: Retrieved on the 6th June 2014 Grandin. 1984. Livest. System Res. Manual.
Volume 1.InternationalLivestock Centre for Africa (ILCA). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Central Statistical Office (CSO)., 2000. Agriculture and Livestock Surveys in Communal Lands. Central Statistical
Office, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Coles, C., Mitchell, J., 2011. Gender and Agricultural Value Chains, a review of current knowledge and practice and
their policy implications, ESA Working Paper n°11-05, Agr. Dev. Econom. Divis., FAO.
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of The United Nations)., 2011a. The State of Food and Agriculture 2010-
Women in agriculture. Clos. gender gap dev. Rome.
Khombe, C.T., Moyo, M., 2011.Bulilima Rural District Council. Strategic Plan (2012-2016). Institute for Rural
Technologies (IRT). Knowledge Transfer Africa. A4Newsletter. eMkambo.2013.
Koots, K.R., Gibson, J.P., Smith, C., (unknown). Economic Values for Beef Production Traits in Ontario. Dep. Anim.
Sci. Poultry Sci., Retrieved on the 12th of June 2014 from http://bru.aps.uoguelph. ca/Articles94 /aeconomic_values_for_beef_product.htm
Kosgey, I., 2004. Breeding Objectives and breeding strategies for the small ruminants inthe tropics. Ph.D. Thesis,
Anim. Breed. Genet. Group, Wageningen University.ISBN: 90-58089906.
Laske, C.H., Teixeira,B.B.M., Dionello, N.J.L., Cardoso, F.F., 2012. Breeding, Genetic and Reproduction. Breeding
objectives and economic values for traits of low imput based beef cattle production system in the State of Rio
Grande do Sul: R.Bras. Zootec.vol.41 no.2 Vicosa Feb. 2012. On-line version ISSN 1806-9290: Retrieved on the
th of June 2014.
Laven, A., van Eerdewijk, A., Senders, C., van, W., Snelder, R., 2009. Gender in value chains: Emerging lessons and
questions, KIT, CIDIN, HIVOS, Agri-Pro-Focus and ICCO, 1-13.
Lebbie, S.H.B., Kagwini, E., 1996. Small Ruminant Research and Developmentin Africa. Proceedings of the Third
Biennial Conference of theAfrcan Small Ruminant Research Network, UICC, Kampala, Uganda, 5-9 December
ILRI (Internat. Livest. Res. Inst.) Nairobi Kenya, pp326.
Madzudzo, E., And Hawkes, K., 1995. Grazing in the Bulilima Mangwe Natural Resource Management Area. CASS
Occasional Paper Series-NRM; 1995. Centre Appl. Soc. Sci., University of Zimbabwe, P.O Box MP 167 Mount
Pleasant., Harare
Mahati, S.T., Munyati, S.,Chandiwana, B., Mashange, W., 2008. Situational analysis of orphaned and vulnerable
children ineight Zimbabwean districts. Biomedical Research and Training Institute in collaboration with the
National Institute of Health Research of the Ministry of Health and Child Welfare. ISBN978-0-69-2234. Human
Sci. Council Press.
Mhlanga, F.N., 2000. Module CASD 303: Animal Breeding 2. Zimbabwe Open University, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Moyo, S, Swanepoel, F.J.C., Rege, J.E.O., 1996. Evaluation of indigenous, exotic and crossbred cattle for beef
Production in a semi-arid environment: reproductive performance and cow productivity Proc. Aust. Soc.
Anim. Prod. 1996 Vol. 21: Retrieved on the 13th of May 2013.
Moyo, M.T., 2002. Program Sites Overview. Integrated Rural Development Program: Retrieved on the 7th of June
from www.irdp.up.ac.za
Moyo, S., 1996. The productivity of indigenous and exotic beef breeds and their crosses at Matopos, Zimbabwe.
PhD thesis. Dep. Anim. Wildlife Sci., University of Pretoria, South Africa.166 pp
Mukuahima, G., 2008. the performance of beef cattle bulls in the Vrede district of Mpumalanga, South Africa,
Dep. Anim. Wildlife Sci., University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa: Retrieved on the 10th of May
from
Musemwa, L., Mushunje, A., Chimoyo., Mapiye, C., 2010. Low cattle market off-take rates in communal production
systems of South Africa: causes and mitigation strategies. J. Susta. Dev. Africa., 12(5).
Ndebele, J.J., Muchenje, V., Mapiye, C., Chimonyo, M., Musemwa, L., Ndlovu, T., 2007. Cattle breeding
management practices in the Gwayi smallholder farming area of South-western Zimbabwe. Livest. Res. Rur.
Dev., 19 (12).
Ndlovu, L., 2013. Neglecting Objects or Valued Human Beings: the Ndebeke People’s Perception of The
disadvantaged as expressed in the Proverb. Eur. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., ISSN 2220-9425, Vol.20, No.1 2013.
Ndlovu, S., 2010 .Coping with drought. Research findings from Bulilima and Mangwe Districts, Matabeleland South,
Zimbabwe.
Nqeno, N., 2008. Reproductive Performance of Cows in Sweet and Sour Veld Types Under Communal Production
Systems in Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Dep. Livest. Pasture Sci.
Rowlands, J., Nagda, S., Rege, E, Nairobi, Mhlanga, F., Dzama, K., Gandiya, F., Hamudikwanda, H., Makuza, S.,
Moyo, S., Matika, O., Nangomasha, E., Sikosana, J., 2003. A report to FAO on The design, execution and
analysis of livestock breed surveys – a case study in Zimbabwe. ILRI (Internat. Livest. Res. Inst.).
Tavirimirwa, B., Mwembe, R., Ngulube B., Banana, N.Y.D., Nyamushamba, G.B., Ncube, S., Nkomboni, D., 2013.
Communal cattle production in Zimbabwe: A review. Livest. Res. Rur. Dev., 25 (12) 2013. Villiers, de M. And
Bergh, L.2013. Practical Bull Management. Journal 2013.
Thornton, P.K., Kruska, R.L., Henninger, N., Kristjanson, P.M., Reid, R.S., Atieno, F., Odero, Ndegwa, A.N.T., 2002.
Mapping poverty and livestock in the developing world. Nairobi, International Livestock Research Institute
(ILRI).
United States Agency, International Development., 2010. Zimbabwe Food Security Outlook April 2010: Retrieved
on the 11th of June from Parliament Research Department. 2011. Parliament Zimbabwe. Bulilima West
Constituency Profile.
Wollny, C.B.A., 2003. The need to conserve farm animal genetic resources in Africa: should policy makers be
concerned? Ecol. Econ., 45, 341– 351.
Zimbabwe Herd Breeders Association., 1991. Beef Breeders’ J. Publ. Zimbabwe Herdbook.
Zimbabwe Vulnerability Assessment Committee (ZimVAC)., 2013. Rural Livelihoods Assessment.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 A Ncube, A B Dube, C T Khombe, Never Assan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
