Comparative study on productive performance, egg quality, egg geometry and hatching traits of three age groups of indigenous Peshawari Aseel chickens

Authors

  • A. Sohail Department of Poultry Production, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, Pakistan
  • A. Muhammad Department of Poultry Production, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, Pakistan
  • J. Hussain Department of Poultry Production, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, Pakistan
  • A. Iqbal Department of Poultry Production, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, Pakistan
  • M. Usman Department of Poultry Production, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, Pakistan
  • A. Rehman Department of Poultry Production, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, Pakistan
  • F. Hussnain Department of Poultry Production, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, Pakistan

Keywords:

Indigenous chicken, Peshawari Aseel, Production performance, Egg quality, Egg geometry

Abstract

The aim of study was to compare three production cycles of different age groups of indigenous Peshawari Aseel chicken at Indigenous Chicken Genetic Resource Center (ICGRC), UVAS Ravi Campus Pattoki for the duration of 4 weeks. For this Purpose 24 birds of 3 different production cycles (1, 2 and 3 at the age of 35, 65 and 95) were used. Eight birds in each category comprising 7 females and 1 male were placed in each replicate.  The data was collected regarding production performance, egg quality and egg geometry and analyzed through Completely Randomized Design (CRD) using analysis of variance (ANOVA) techniques. Means were compared using Fisher’s LSD (Least significant Difference) Test by the help of SAS (Statistical Analysis System). Non-significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in cumulative feed intake at the start of experiment week 1, week 3 and week 4. The birds in 2nd production cycle remained the highest feed consumer throughout the experimental period followed by 1st and 3rd production cycles along with same trend in calories, protein, Ca, P, Lysine and Methionine intake throughout the experimental period. The birds in 2nd production cycle remained significantly higher egg producer along with production of higher egg mass and better FCR. Non-significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in the egg shell % of 1st, 2nd and 3rd production cycles. The birds of 3rd production cycle remained the highest in the Haugh unit score and yolk index throughout the experimental period followed by 1st and 2nd production cycle. Non-significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in shape index, egg surface area and egg volume in all the three production cycles. The birds of 3rd production cycle remained significantly higher in shape index throughout the experimental period followed by the 1st and 2nd production cycle.

References

Brake, J., walsh, T.J., Benton, C.E., Petitte, J.N., Meiherhof, R., Penalva, G., 1997. Egg handling and storage. Poultry

Science 76, 144-151.

Butcher, G., Miles, R., Nilipour, A., 1991. La Calidad del cascaróndelhuevo. Industria.Avicola, 38, 9-10.

Gupta, R.K., Singh, M., Singh, U., Gurung, B.S., 2000. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. Vol. 70 No. 11 pp. 1170-

Haugh, R., 1937. The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. US Egg. Poultry Mag., 43, 522-555, 572-573

Haunshi, S., Niranjan, M., Shanmugam, M., Padhi, M.K., Reddy, M.R., Sunitha, R., Rajkumar, U., Panda, A.K., 2011.

Characterization of two Indian native chicken breeds for production, egg and semen quality, and welfare

traits. Poultry Science 90, 314-320.

Hill, A.T., Hall, J.W., 1980. Effects of various combinations of oil spraying, washing, sanitizing, storage time, strain,

and age upon albumen quality changes in storage and minimum sample sizes required for their

measurement. Poultry Science 59, 2237–2242.

Islam, M.A., Bulbuli, S.M., Seeland, G., Islam, A.B., 2001. Egg quality of different chicken genotypes in summer and

winter. Pak. J. Bid. Science, 4, 1411-1414.

Latour, M.A., Peebles, E.D., Doyle, S.M., Pansky, T., Smith, T.W., Boyle, C.R., 1998. Broiler breeder age and dietary

fat influence the yolk fatty acid profiles of fresh eggs and newly hatched chicks. Poultry Science 77, 47-53.

Latour, M.A., Peebles, E.D., Boyle, C.R., Doyle, S.M., Pansky, T., Brake, J.D., 1996. Effect of breeder hen age and

dietary fat on embryonic and neonatal broiler serum lipids and glucose. Poultry Science 75, 965-701.

Littell, R.C., Freund, R.J., Spector, P.C., 1991. SAS_ System for Linear Models.3rd ed. SAS_ Series in Statistical

Applications. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

Narushin V.G., Romanov, M.N., 2002b. Egg Physical Characteristics and Hatchability. World’s Poultry Science

Journal 58, 297-303

Narushin, V.G., van Kempen, T.A., Wineland, M.J., Chris-tensen, V.L., 2004. Comparing infrared spectroscopy and

egg size measurements for predicting egg shell quality. Biosyst. Eng., 87, 367–373.

Narushin, V.G., 2005. Egg Geometry Calculations Using Measurements of Length and Breadth. Poultry Science 84,

-484

Niranjan, M., Sharma, R.P., Rajkumar, U., Chatterjee, R.N., Reddy, B.L.N., Battacharya, T.K., 2008. Livestock

Research for Rural Development India

Silversides, F.G., Villeneuve, P., 1994. Is the Haugh unit correction for egg weight valid for eggs stored at room

temperature. Poultry Science 73, 50–55.

Silversides, F.G., scott, T.A., 2001. Effect of storage and layer age on quality of eggs from two lines of hens. Poultry

Science 80, 1240-1245.

Singh, R., Cheng, K.M., Silversides, F.G., 2009. Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying

hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. Poultry Science, 88, 256-264.

Sokal, R.R., Rholf, F.J., 1995. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Co. New York

Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H., Dickey, D.A., 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biochemical approach, 3rd

ed. McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc., New York, USA.

Yoshimura, Barua, Y., Olira, A., Heryanto H., Zheng, W., 1997. Reproductive physiology in domestic animals: a basic

knowledge to improve poultry production in Asian countries. Journal of International Development and

Cooperation, Hiroshima University, Vol. 3, pp. 27-41.

Published

2013-02-28

How to Cite

Sohail, A. ., Muhammad, A. ., Hussain, J. ., Iqbal, A. ., Usman, M. ., Rehman, A. ., & Hussnain, F. . (2013). Comparative study on productive performance, egg quality, egg geometry and hatching traits of three age groups of indigenous Peshawari Aseel chickens. Scientific Journal of Veterinary Advances, 2(2), 21-25. Retrieved from http://sjournals.com/index.php/sjva/article/view/1473

Issue

Section

Original Article