Correlation between clinical and radiological grading of osteoarthritis


  • S. Singh Era's Lucknow Medical College, India
  • V. Khanna Era's Lucknow Medical College, India


Osteoarthritis, KL Grading, WOMAC Scoring


Primary knee Osteoarthritis is a common condition affecting human beings after fourth decade of life. The diagnosis is based on a) Clinical presentation alone or b) on clinical and radiological findings or c) on clinical presentation, radiological findings and laboratory results. Hence, correlation between clinical scoring and radiological staging is helpful in predicting the severity as well as clinical outcome of the disease. We screened 100 female patients suffering from primary knee pain for atleast 6 months of duration or more. All cases with secondary causes of knee osteoarthrits were excluded from the study. All cases were asked to get an anteroposterior standing radiograph of the involved knee and radiological assessment was done by Kellegren Lawrence grading (K-L grading) method. They were also asked to fill up the WOMAC questionnaire while waiting for the radiograph to develop. The results thus obtained were compared and correlated with the help of Pearson’s coefficient of correlation. The mean WOMAC score is found to be 51(max.81, min.17). The better the WOMAC score, the greater grade of severity according to KL grading was obtained. The Pearsons coefficient of correlation was calculated to be +0.904. The result shows a directly proportional relation between WOMAC score and K- L grading. Hence, with accurate history taking and clinical examination as well as WOMAC scoring one can predict the occurrence of knee Osteoarthritis earlier than its radiological appearance. Hence, giving more time to halt the progression of the disease at a much earlier stage when the destruction is at the cartilage level with no or very little bony destruction.


Bellamy, N., 1989., Pain assessment in osteoarthritis, Experience with the WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Semin

Arthr. Rheumat., 18 (supplement 2), 14-17.

Bellamy, N., 2009. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index User Guide IX.

Bellamy, N., Buchanan, W.W., 1988. Validation study of WOMAC, A health status instrument for measuring

clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis

of the hip or knee. J. Rheumatol., 15, 1833-1840.

Bierma-Zeinstra, S.M., Oster, J.D., Bernsen, R.M., Verhaar, J.A., Ginai, A.Z., Bohnen, A.M., 2002. Joint space

narrowing and relationship with symptoms and signs in adults consulting for hip pain in primary care. J.

Rheumatol., 29 (8), 1713–8. PMID 12180735.

Kellgren, J.H., Lawrence, J.S., 1957. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 16, 494–502.

Osteoarthritis, 2001., At Dorland's Medical Dictionary.

Phillips, C.R., Brasington, R.D., 2010. Osteoarthritis treatment update, Are NSAIDs still in the picture. J. Musculosk.

Med., 27 (2).

Stucki, G., Sangha, O., Stucki, S., Michel, B.A., Tyndall, A., Dick, W., Theiler, R., 1998. Comparison of the WOMAC

(Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) osteoarthritis index and a self-report format of the selfadministered Lequesne-Algofunctional index in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr.

Cartilage., 6(6),441-2.

Zhang, W., Doherty, M., Peat, G., Bierma-Zeinstra, M.A., Arden, N.K,, Bresnihan, B., Herrero-Beaumont, G.,

Kirschner, S., Leeb, B.F., Lohmander, L.S., Mazières, B., Pavelka, K., Punzi, L., So, A.K., Tuncer, T., Watt, I.,

Bijlsma, J.W., 2010. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis". Ann.

Rheum. Dis., 69 (3), 483–9. doi,10.1136/ard.2009.113100.PMID 19762361.



How to Cite

Singh, S. ., & Khanna, V. . (2014). Correlation between clinical and radiological grading of osteoarthritis. Scientific Journal of Medical Science, 3(5), 320-324. Retrieved from



Original Article