Opportunities and challenges of adopting community forestry: a case study of Nepal
Keywords:
Community forest, Conservation, Environment, Equity, ExclusionAbstract
This study aims to investigate the dynamics of forest management handed over to the local user groups in three districts of Nepal with due consideration of local-specific conservation and development requirements. A total of 384 households were interviewed in 24 community forest user groups covering three geographical regions of Nepal. The research findings revealed that there are multiple unresolved issues and challenges in all areas of capital and governance about the community forestry. Poor and marginalized households are inferior and vulnerable, and have less access to forest resources and decision making. In all the study areas, the higher caste holds the supreme power pertaining to community forests and financially weak households are often excluded from the developmental programs. Furthermore, national forest policies are slow to respond change, which become barrier in proper forest management and utilization. The research findings revealed that various types of inputs and services are needed to achieve the dual goals of environmental conservation and poverty alleviation as envisaged by Nepal’s sustainable development framework.
References
Acharya, K.P., 2002. Twenty-four years of community forestry in Nepal. Int. Forestry Rev. 4, 149-156.
Adhikari, B., 2005. Poverty, property rights and collective action: Understanding the distributive aspects of common property resource management. Environ. Dev. Econ. 10, 7-31.
Adhikari, B., Di Falco, S., Lovett, J.C., 2004. Household characteristics and forest dependency: evidence from common property forest management in Nepal. Ecolog. Econ. 48, 245-257.
Bohra, P., Massey, D.S., 2009. Processess of internal and international migration from Chitwan, Nepal. Int. Migration Rev. 43, 621-651.
Chhetri, R., Pandey, T.R., 1992. User group forestry in the Far-Western Region of Nepal: case study from Baitadi and Accham. International Centre for Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
DOF, 2011. Status of Community Forestry. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Department of Forests, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Gautam, A.P., 2009. Equity and livelihoods in Nepal's community forestry. Int. J. Soc. Forestry 2, 101-122.
Gautam, A.P., Shivakoti, G.P., Webb, E.L., 2004. A review of forest policies, institutions, and changes in the resource condition in Nepal. Int. Forestry Rev. 6, 136-148.
Gautam, K.H., 2006. Forestry, politicians and power--perspectives from Nepal's forest policy. Forest Policy Econ. 8, 175-182.
Giri, K., Ojha, H., 2010. Enhancing livelihoods from community forestry in Nepal: can technobureaucratic behaviour allow innovation systems to work? 9th European IFSA Symposium, 4-7 July 2010, Vienna, Austria.
Graner, E., 1997. The political ecology of community forestry in Nepal. Verlag fur Entwickungspolitik, Saarbrucken.
Kanel, K.R., Dahal, G.R., 2008. Community forestry policy and its economic implications: an experience from Nepal. Int. J. Soc. Forestry 1, 50-60.
Kanel, K.R., Niraula, D.R., 2004. can rural livelihood be improved in Nepal through community forestry? Banko Janakari 14, 19-26.
Khadka, K.R., 2009. Why does exclusion continue? Aid, knowledge and power in Nepal's community forestry policy process. Maastricht, Shaker Publishing, The Netherlands.
Kumar, S., 2002. Does "Participation" in Common Pool Resource Management Help the Poor? A Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of Joint Forest Management in Jharkhand, India. World Dev. 30, 763-782.
MOF, 2011. Economic Survey: Fiscal Year 2010/11. Ministry of Finance (MOF), Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
MPFS, 1988. Main report: Forestry Sector Master Plan HMGN/ADB/FINNIDA, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Ojha, H.R., Cameron, J., Kumar, C., 2009. Deliberation or symbolic violence? The governance of community forestry in Nepal. Forest Policy Econ. 11, 365-374.
Pokharel, B.K., 2004. Contribution of community forestry to people's livelihoods and forest sustainability: experience from Nepal. World Rainforest Movement, Maldonado, Uruauay, http://www.wrm.org.uy/countries/Asia/Nepal.html (accessed on 20th July, 2011).
Sapkota, I.P., Oden, P.C., 2008. Household characteristics and depedency on community forests in Terai of Nepal. Int. J. Soc. Forestry 1, 123-144.
Springate-Baginski, O., Soussan, J.G., Dev, O.P., Yadav, N.P., Kiff, E., 1999. Community forestry in Nepal: impacts on common property resource management. School of Environment and Development, Series No. 3, University of Leeds, UK.
Springate-Baginski, O., Yadav, N.P., Dev, O.P., Soussan, J.G., 2003. Community forest management in the middle hills of Nepal: the challengs and context. Forest Livelihood 3, 5-20.
Wagley, M., Ojha, H., 2002. Analyzing participatory trends in Nepal's community forestry. Policy Trend, 122-142, IGES, Japan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Rajesh Bista, Anup Gurung, Rahul Karki, Shanti Shrestha, Dharam Raj Uprety
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
