Justification of Intellectual Property Rights, Using Game Theory Approach
Keywords:
Intellectual Property Rights , Protection of Intellectual Property Rights, Game TheoryAbstract
The creation of intellectual rights protection is a challenging task, Since its creation. Protection of the rights and granted the exclusive right to use, Creates the social costs. In other words, Due to lack of access of other people's ,to this invention Economic and industrial development is reduced In contrast, The lack of support for inventors Reduce the incentives for people to produce intellectual property. Therefore, the Legislators to support or not support the creation of intellectual rights , Faced by The challenge to equilibrium Between protecting the Private interests and Motivation for the production of intellectual goods and, And protect social benefits of access to intellectual goods. It must be said that intellectual property rights Directly effective On innovations, inventions and technology transfer Into the country. In this paper, Different perspective on the necessity of protecting the rights and shall be reviewed, To determine why that is and why these rights should be protected and ,What is the basis for this support.
References
Alan, O.S., 2004. The Economics of public International Law, University Chicago Law and Economics, online working paper, No. 216, available at: ssrn.com.July. Also., 2008. look at that: Mahmood Hekmatnia foundations of intellectual property. publicat. Inst.Islam. Thought Cultur., second edition, pp. 327. Arnold Plant., 1995. The Economic Theory concerning patents for Inventions , 1 Economica, February new series. University of Chicago press., pp . 30-51. Bagh – Dold or Patent and Trademark Law Amendments Act., 2000. 35 U . S . C., Birgitte Anderson., 2003. Rationale for Intellectual Property Rights in the Electronic Age, New Economy Handbook. Elsev.Sci., pp. 12-19. Chin , J., Gene, M., Grossman., 1990. Intellectual property Rights and North – South Trade , In R. W. Jones and A.O. Krueger, The political Economy of International Trade, Cambridge MA. Basil Blackwell Publ., pp 90 – 107 . Donald Richard., 2004. Intellectual Property Rights and global Capitalism. Polit. Eco. Trips Agreem., New York , M , E . Sharpe. Edwin Mansfield., 1986. Patent and Innovation : An Empirical study. 32 Manag. Sci., p . 173 . also see Francis Narin etal , what patents tell you about your competition , Chemtech , (February 1993) , p . 52 . Gene, M., Grissman., Edwin, L.C., Lai., 2002. International Protection of Intellectual property , NBER working paper , No . 8794. Cambridge MA., p. 28. Gene, M., Grossman., Lai, L.C., 2002. Edwin International protection of intellectual property, NBER working paper. Cambridge MA , No . 8749 , January. George hegel., 2006 The phenomenology of mind , (1860) , available at http://www.marxists.org/ refrences/archieve/hegel/help/hegelbio.htm. Hettinger, E., 1989. Justifying intellectual property , 18 philosophy and public affairs., pp . 31-52. Itai Sened., 1997. The political institution of private property, Combridge, Cambridge University press., p65. J.A.L., 2003. Sterling world copyright law , sweet & Maxwell., p . 67, James, W., Friedman., 1990. Game Theory with application to Economics, New York : Oxford University press., also see Prajit K Dutta , op . cit . James, W., Friedman., op . cit . also See Prajit K Dutta , op . cit .
John Locke., 2006. Second treatise of civil government , hacked publication company, (1690), published at 1980 , available at : http://www.contitution.org/jL/2ndtreat.txt. John, G., 1969. Restitutionary principle in tort. Monash Univ. law Rev., p. Judith, C., Gene, M., Grossman., 1990. Intellectual property Rights and North – South Trade, In R . W Jones and A.O Krueger , The political Economy of International Trade, Cambridge MA. Basil Blackwell publ., p . 100. Keith, E., Maskus., 2000. Parallel Imports. world eco., 23(9)., pp . 1269-1284. Kenneth, H., 2006. Justifying intellectual property protection : why the interests of content – creators usually wins over everyone else's, (2005). Available at : http://www.repositories .cadlib.org/bclt/its/12., Also see E Hittinger , op.cit, , p . 36. Michael, A., 2000. Carrier , Unravelling the patent – Antitrust paradox , 150 U. Pa. Law Rev., p . 761. Mirghasem, J., 2009-2010. a general lesson notes Creations Intellectual Rights, Faculty of Law, University of Shahid Beheshti. leaflets academ., year, pp. 13-12. Peter, S., Arno., Michael, H., Davis., 2001. why don't we enforce existing drug price controls ? The unrecognized and unforced reasonable pricing requirements imposed upon patents deriving in whole or in part from federally funded research. 75 Tulane law Rev., pp . 631-688. Philip, M.C., 2002. Calman., National Patents, Innovation and International agreements. J. Int. Trade Econom. Dev., 11(1), pp. 1-14. Pratij, K., Dutta., 1999. Strategies and Games – Theory and Practice. Cambr. MIT press. Rebecca, S., Eisenberg., 1996. Public Research and Private development : patents and Technology Transfer in federally funded research. Virgin. Law Rev., 82, p . 1663. Richard, A., Posener., 2002. The law and Economics of intellectual property , Dedalus. Robert, M., Richard, R., Nelson., 1998. The benefits and costs of strong patent protection : A contributition to the current debate. Res. Policy., 27,pp . 273 – 284. Simone, A., Rose., 1998-1999. Patent Monopolyphobia : A Means of Extinguishing the fountain head ? , 49 case W. Res . law Rev., 509, p . 579. Susan, K., Seel., 2003. private power, public Law : The globalization of intellectual property Rights. Cambr. Univ. Press. Thomas, H., 2006. Philosophical rudiment concerning government and society , (1651) , available at: http://www.constitution.org. William, M., 2003. Landes and Richard A.Posener, The Economic Structure of Intellectual property Law, Cambridge. Harv. Univ. press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Amir Gheisarzadeh, Saeid kheradmandy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
