Environmental Crisis Management in Natural and Climatic Events

Abstract

Today, guiding the processes of efficiency’s increase in the crisis management committee’s performance is one of the main government’s long- term goals. Due to this, the main challenges of the political policies and strategic capabilities of the ruling governments in developed and developing countries are closely related to the procedures and theories of crisis management. By looking more deeply at the collation of the crisis management procedures of the different countries in comparison to the past and the present, clearly we find out significant differences in the management process of the developed countries. The base of the new crisis management’s strategic pyramid in developed countries is based on integrated, powerful and multi-dimensional analytical committees. These committees with coherent, continuous and dependent structure are directed and managed by scientific – technical, political-economic, social subcategories therapeutic. Theories and modern management methods, even with high levels of international relations, are based on the same principles. In the first step, the main purpose of these committees is to evaluate and analyze the theories, technologies and modern equipment in non-critical conditions. In the second step, they are expected to forecast various events in the long term, and assess the probability of the future crises, that may be contributing to or originating from the current crisis. In the third step, using cutting-edge technology, to the extent possible and according to need, they manage the critical events. In other words, they use practical solutions, diverse and innovative strategic management theories of “crisis in crisis” and “crisis from crisis”. In the last step, in order to prepare infrastructures of the modern management crisis, they attempt to acquaint the non-specialist with new technologies and new scientific, technical, therapeutic, and medical methods through the mass media.  After the last step of the modern management, management process continues like the current crisis management in developing countries. Since the correct and practical guidance of the various events will only achieve by strengthening the scientific base, it is necessary to predict the effects and risks of the current critical events and also to manage the results in the coming decades. For this reason, there should be a plan to expand the concept of “Modern Crisis Management” in developing countries with the aim of advancing knowledge toward understanding, recognition, and optimizing modern technologies use. By comparing the views of trans-management’s crisis, we consider major shortcomings and challenges of the incident management in developing countries as “Modern Crisis Management”. These concepts are formed according to the models of potential disasters prediction resulting from the past crises.  So, disasters and inconsistencies are analyzed by predicting and assessing the cause of the current crises and its effect on the crisis which may occur in the future. In this method, Algorithm of natural, non-natural, climatic and even Organizational Environmental Disaster Management Infrastructures is the same.