Amalgamate the application performance and product lifecycle

Authors

  • D.R. S.T. Salunke Vice President Engineering & Development, Ph.D. In Management & Engineering & DR. R. K. SRIVASTAVA, Professor & HOD SIMSREE Mumbai, India

Keywords:

Industrial product strategy, success factors of new products

Abstract

The aim  of this paper are twofold: to review theapplication performance based on  scopeof product life cycle (PLC) research; to pinpoint areas requiring furtherinvestigation on synchronization of Product application performance & PLC. Newfunctionality, are creating new performance issues while applicationdevelopment, testing, and release to production cycles are at an acceleratingpace.  In the midst of these demands, newtechnologies such as Mobile, Virtualization and Cloud are complicating theenvironments in which applications are delivered. This paper will help in unifyand communicate effectively between teams throughout the application lifecycleto maximum the application performance that is the lifeblood of any organization’sbusiness operation.

References

Anthony, A., 2012. How safe is the consumer, Int. J. Res. Comm. Managem., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 7.

Archibald, R.D., Voropaev, V.I., 2003. Project categories and life cycle models: report on the 2003 IPMA

global survey, paper presented at the 18th IPMA Congress. Budapest., June 18-22.

Bailetti, A.J., Liu, Y., 2012. Launch Aggressiveness and Product Performance,Dep. System.Comput. Eng.

Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario., K1S 5B6, pp.1-10

Bokinge, M., Malmqvist, J., 2012, PLM implementation guidelines – relevance and application in practice:

a discussion of findings from a retrospective case study. Int. J. Prod. Lifecyc. Managm., vol. 6, no.1,

pp. 79–98.

Catry, B., Chevalier, M., 1974. Market Share Strategy and the Product Life Cycle, J. Market., 38 , 29-34.

Di Macro, P., 2012. Gucci has more designs on India, to expand ops, Economic Times., 26 November, p. 7.

Dodge, H., Robert, R., David, 1978. Phasing Sales Strategies and Tactics in Accordance with the Product

Life Cycle Dimension Rather Than Calendar Periods, in Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues

and Directions, SubhashJain, ed. Amer. Market. Assoc., Chicago.

Driffield, N., Björn, J., 2012. Challenging the production function approach to assess the developmental

effects of FDl. Europ. J.Dev. Res., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 32-37, doi, 10.1057/ejdr.2011.50.

Fox, H., Rink, D., 1977. Coordination of Purchasing with Sales Trends. J. Purch., 13 , 10-18.

Kovac, F., Dague, M., 1972. Forecasting by Product Life Cycle Analysis. Res. Man.,

Parsons, Leonard, 1975. The Product Life Cycle and Time-Varying Advertising Elasticities, J. Market. Res.,

, 476-480

Downloads

Published

2013-09-29

How to Cite

S.T. Salunke, D. (2013). Amalgamate the application performance and product lifecycle. Scientific Journal of Review, 2(9), 249-255. Retrieved from http://sjournals.com/index.php/sjr/article/view/649

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 9 (2013): September

Section

Engineering

License

Copyright (c) 2013 D.R. S.T. Salunke

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.