Recognition and redefinition of theoretical challenges in religious and moral upbringing and training: force and upbringing

Authors

  • Zohreh Esmaeili Assistant professor, Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Payamenoor University, pobox 19395 -3697Theran, IR of IRAN
  • Mohammad Javad Yazdanparast MA student of history and philosophy of education, Payamenoor University,Theran, IR of IRAN

Keywords:

upbringing, religious upbringing, moral upbringing, force

Abstract

Human is the result of upbringing and needs upbringing more than any other creature; therefore, the most valuable human affair is upbringing. Regarding the influence of force on upbringing whether about ourselves or others, at first, it is enough to answer this question that what the meaning of force is and whether it has middle point or extravagance and wastage. Can it have stages and levels or be mild? When can we benefit from force in upbringing? Are upbringing and force external factors or internal ones? The main purpose of present study is to answer the question that whether we can use force as an influential method in upbringing? It is clear from this question that force is recommended in some cases and refused in some others and must be applied based on the age and proper condition; therefore, attention to these points pave the way for reaching upbringing goals. Methodology of this study was qualitative and researches, papers, texts, lectures and books which relate to force were studied to answer the research question.

References

Amid, H., 2010. Amid Persian Dictionary, Editor Azizolah Alizadeh, Miladnoor Printing/ sample., p 73.

Bagheri, K., 2001. Damage and health in religious education, Islamic education., Book VI, p 22.

Bagheri, K.h., The film lecture entitled Islamic education. Blog Address: http://ensaneamel.

blogfa.com/post/16.

Cheraghcheshm, A., The article of Pathology of religious education in schools.

Dehkhoda, A.A., 1994. Dictionaries, Tehran university publication., vol 4, pp. 57 and 76.

Durkheim. E., 2012. Training and social sciences, translated by Fereidun sarmad, Kandokav Press., pp. 65

and 66.

Hemat Bonary, A., 2003. Etymology of moral education, Qom. Islam. Educat., P9.

Hosseinkhani, H., 2007. Pathology of moral education (imposed education).

Kulayni, M.I.Y., 1986. Alkafy, Tehran, Islamic Book house vol 8, p 334.

Kulayni, M.I.Y., caffee, volume 2, translated by Seyed Javad Mostafavi, Tehran, Fourteen Infallible (PBUH)

Mosque Publication., p. 86.

Mesbah Yazdi, M.T., 2002. Ethics, the research of Ahmad Hossein Sharifi. Tehran International Publication.

Mirza Mohammadi, M.H., 2009. Summer. Principles and philosophy of education, Arash print., P. 80. The

Holy Quran.

Motahari, M., 1994. Education in Islam, the twenty-third edition. Sadra Publication., pp. 373, 376.

Motahari, M., 1994. Man in Quran, Eighth Edition. Sadra Publication., p. 46.

Naguibzadeh, M.A.H., 1989. A Look at the Philosophy of Education, Tehran, Tahoori.

Rahmati, Shahreza, M., 2012. What to say, the successful youth publication., page 258.

Saliba, J., 1991. Dictionary of Philosophy and Social Sciences, translated by K. Berg Nysy and S. Sajjadi,

Tehran. Publish. Comp., p 120.

Seyyed Razi (God bless him)., Winter 2004. Nahjolbalagheh, translated by Mohammad Dashti., Wisdom

, p 455.

Tayeb, M., Misbah al-Huda in attitude and methodology of followers of affection and religious leaders.,

Pp. 108, 109, 110, 111.

Published

2014-07-25

How to Cite

Esmaeili, Z. ., & Javad Yazdanparast, M. . (2014). Recognition and redefinition of theoretical challenges in religious and moral upbringing and training: force and upbringing. Scientific Journal of Review, 3(7), 739-746. Retrieved from http://sjournals.com/index.php/sjr/article/view/495

Issue

Section

Education