Input processing theory

Authors

  • Hossein Khazaee Department of English Translation, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran
  • Roxana Sheikh Department of English Translation, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran

Keywords:

input processing theory, input, second or foreign language

Abstract

This presentation deals with input processing theory (hereafter IP theory) of VanPatten (2002a, 2002b, 2004, and 2009) and VanPatten and a number of his collaborates (e.g. VanPatten and Cadierno, 1993a, and 1993b; Wong and VanPatten, 2003). For this it explains the importance of input in discussions of language learning especially the learning of a second or foreign language. Then an elaboration of IP theory will be presented, theoretical and pedagogical implications of this theory for second language acquisition (SLA) will be pinpointed, and finally criticisms on IP will be discussed.

References

Benati, A. (2005). The effects of processing instruction, traditional instruction and meaning—output instruction on the acquisition of the English past simple tense. Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 67- 93. Benati, A. (2013). The input processing theory in second language acquisition. In M. P. G. Mayo, M. J. G. Mangado & M. M. Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 93- 110). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (2002). What does frequency have to do with grammar teaching? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 199-208. Bley-Vroman, R. (2002). Frequency in production, comprehension, and acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 209-213. Carroll, S. (1999). Putting ‘input’ in its proper place. Second Language Research, 15, 337-388. Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Carroll, S. (2004). Commentary: Some general and specific comments on input processing and processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 293–309). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Chaudron, C. (1985). Intake: On methods and models for discovering learners’ processing of input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 1-14. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143- 188. Ellis, R., & He, X. (1999). The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 285-301. DeKeyser, R., Salaberry, R., Robinson, P., & Harrington, M. (2002). What gets processed in processing instruction? A commentary on Bill VanPatten’s “Processing instruction: An update”. Language Learning, 52(4), 805-823. Gass, S. M. (2010). The relationship between L2 input and L2 output. In E.Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 194-219). London: Continuum International Publishing Group. Harrington, M. (2004). Commentary: Input processing as a theory of processing input. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 79–92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Harrington, M., & Dennis, S. (2002). Input-driven language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 261-268. Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 541-577. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Making sense of frequency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 275-285. Mitchell, R., & Miles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories. London: Edward Arnold. Neumann, O. (1996). Theories of attention. In O. Neumann, & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action (pp. 389–446). San Diego: Academic Press Ltd. Rast, R. (2008). Foreign Language Input Initial Processing. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd. Sharwood Smith, M. (1986). Comprehension versus acquisition: Two ways of processing input. Applied Linguistics, 7, 239-256. Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179. Sun, Y. A. (2008). Input processing in second language acquisition: A discussion of four input processing models. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 1-10. VanPatten, B. (2002a). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52(4), 755-803. VanPatten, B. (2002b). Processing the content of input–processing and processing instruction research: A response to Dekeyser, Salaberry, Robinson, and Harrington. Language Learning, 52(4), 825-831. VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in second language acquisition. In B.VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. VanPatten, B. (2009). Processing matters in input enhancement. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. VanPatten, B., & Benati, A. G. (2010). Key terms in second language acquisition. London: Continuum International Publishing Group. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993a). Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 77(1), 45-57. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993b). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 225-243. White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the developmental of second language competence. Applied Linguistics, 8, 95-110. White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P. M., & Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 416-432. Wong, W. (2004). The nature of processing instruction. In In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 33-65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Wong, W., & VanPatten, B. (2003). The evidence is IN: Drills are OUT. Foreign Language Annals, 36(3), 403-423.

Published

2015-08-27

How to Cite

Khazaee, H. ., & Sheikh, R. . (2015). Input processing theory. Scientific Journal of Review, 4(8), 110-115. Retrieved from http://sjournals.com/index.php/sjr/article/view/434

Issue

Section

Education