Effects of different cropping pattern on performance of maize-soybean mixture in Makurdi, Nigeria


  • M. O. Ijoyah Department of Crop Production, University of Agriculture, P.M.B 2373, Makurdi, Nigeria
  • F. T. Fanen Department of Crop Production Technology, Akperan Orshi College of Agriculture, Yandev, Benue State, Nigeria


Intercropping, Cropping pattern, Maize, Soybean, Nigeria


Field experiments were conducted from July to November during the 2009 and 2010 cropping seasons, at the Research Farm, University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria, to evaluate the effects of different cropping pattern on performance of maize-soybean mixture and to assess the advantage of the intercropping system. The treatments consisted of four cropping patterns, which consisted of alternating one stand of maize with one stand of soybean (1sM:1sS); one stand of maize alternated with two stands of soybean (1sM:2sS); one row of maize alternated with one row of soybean (1rM:1rS); and one row of maize alternated with two rows of soybean (1rM:2rS), while the sole crops of maize and soybean constituted the fifth and sixth treatments, which also serve as controls. The six treatments were replicated four times in a randomized complete block design. The results obtained showed that alternating 1sM:1sS gave the greatest intercrop yields of maize and soybean and highest land equivalent ratio (LER) values of 1.87 and 1.86 respectively, in years 2009 and 2010, indicating that the greatest productivity per unit area was achieved by growing the two crops together alternating 1sM:1sS, than by growing them separately. With these LER values, 46.5 % and 46.2 % of land were respectively saved in 2009 and 2010, which could be used for other agricultural purposes. This study showed that in a maize-soybean intercropping system, the appropriate cropping pattern would be alternating 1sM:1sS. This should therefore be recommended for Makurdi location, Nigeria


Atungwu, J.J., Afolami, S.O., 2001. Field assessment of resistance of some (Glycine max (L.) Merril) lines and

varieties to Meloidogyne spp. Using a combination of gall-index and grain yield. Trop. oil seeds J. 6, 41-49.

Ayeni, A.O., 1987. Maize production in Nigeria: Problems and Prospects, J. of Agri., 2, 123-129.

Dugje, I.Y., Omoigui, L.O., Ekeleme, F., Bandyopadhyay, R., Kumar, P.L., Kamara, A.Y., 2009. Farmers guide to

soybean production in Northern Nigeria, pp16.

Enwezor, W.O.E., Udo, J., Ajotade, K.A., 1989. Fertilizer procurement and distribution. Fertilizer use and

management practice for crops in Nigeria. Savenda Publishers, Nsukka, Nigeria. Pp. 25-28.

Hiebsch, C., Tetio-Kegho, F., Chirembo, F.P., 1995. Plant density and soybean maturity in a soybean-maize

intercrop. Agron. J. 87, 965-970.

Ijoyah, M.O., Dzer, D.M., 2012. Yield performance of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) and Maize (Zea

mays L.) as affected by time of planting maize in Makurdi, Nigeria. International Scholarly Research Network

(ISRN) Agronomy. Volume 2012, Article ID 485810, 7pages, doi: 10.5402/2012/485810.

Ijoyah, M.O., Jimba, J., 2012. Evaluation of yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.) and okra

(Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) intercropping system at Makurdi, Nigeria J. of Biodiv. Env. Sci. 2(2), 38-

Ijoyah, M.O., Adagba, E.O., Iorlamen, T., 2012a. Productivity of okra-maize intercropping system as influenced by

varying maize plant densities in Makurdi, Nigeria. Int. J. Curr. Res. 4(4), 59-63.

Ijoyah, M.O., Amos, A., Fanen, F.T., 2012b. Effect of varying maize intra-row spacing on intercropped yields of egusi

melon (Citrullus lunatus Thunb.) and maize (Zea mays L.) at Makurdi, Nigeria. Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res. 2(1), 22-

Kling, J.G., Edmeades, G., 1997. Morphology and growth of maize. Research Guide No 9 Training Programme.

International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria. Pp. 3-6.

Mohta, N.K., De, R., 1980. Intercropping maize and sorghum with soybean. Agric. Sci. 95, 112-122.

Muneer, A.P., Fida, H.M., Mumtaz, A.K., Muhammad, I.S., 2004. Performance of maize in intercropping system

with soybean under different patterns and nitrogen levels. J. App. Sci. 4(2), 201-205.

Olufajo, O.O., 1992. Response of soybean to intercropping with maize in a subhumid tropical environment. Trop.

oil seeds J. 1, 27-33.

Root, W.R., Oyekan, P.O., Dashiell, K.E., 1987. West and Central Africa, Nigeria sets example for expansion of

soybean. In soybeans for the Tropics Research Production and Utilization. p.230.

Silwana, T.T., Lucas, E.O., 2002. The effect of planting combinations and weeding and yield of component crops of

maize-bean and maize-pumpkin intercrops. J. Agric. Sci. 138, 193-200.

Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H., 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. A Biometrical Approach. 2nd edition,

McGraw Hill, New York, 633pp.

Willey, R.W., 1985. Evaluation and presentation of intercropping advantages. Expl. Agric. 21, 119-133.

Willey, R.W., Rao, M.R., 1980. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Expl. Agric. 16,




How to Cite

O. Ijoyah, M., & T. Fanen, F. (2012). Effects of different cropping pattern on performance of maize-soybean mixture in Makurdi, Nigeria. Scientific Journal of Crop Science, 1(2), 39-47. Retrieved from http://sjournals.com/index.php/sjcs/article/view/1235



Original Article