Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Cover Image

Carcass characteristics of sexed broilers under two rearing systems in three housing zones in environmentally controlled broiler house during winter

K. Bilal, S. Mehmood, M. Akram, S. Ahmad Ahmad, J. Hussain, A.S. Jatoi, H.M. Ishaq, M.S. Shaheen

Abstract


The aim of study was to compare carcass characteristics of broiler housed under two different rearing systems (cage and floor) in three housing zones. For this purpose, 240 day old commercial broilers (Hubbard Classic) were purchased and half of them were reared in cages and other half on floor. Under each system, the birds were further divided in three zones of house (near vent, middle and near variable speed fans). There were four replicates containing 10 birds each. The data were analyzed through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) technique in Completely Randomized Design (CRD) under factorial arrangements. Means were compared using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMR) with the help of SAS 9.1. Pre-slaughter and post-slaughter weight of males rear on the floor exhibited significantly (P<0.05) higher body weight as compared with those rear in the cages. Similarly female attained significantly (P<0.05) higher body weight on floor as compared with those rear in the cages. Dressing percentage, breast weight, leg quarter yield, liver, heart and gizzard weight (filled & empty) in both sexes of broilers reared on floor was significantly (P<0.05) higher as compared to those reared in cages. Pre-slaughter body weight, post-slaughter body weight, Dressing percentage, higher breast weight, higher Leg quarter yields, liver, higher heart and gizzard weight (filled & empty) were found to be better near vents. It can be concluded from the present study that birds reared on floor perform better in area near the vent as compared to the cage.

References


Ain-Baziz, H., Geraert, P., Padilha, J., Guillaumin, S., 1996. Chronic heat exposure enhances fat deposition and modifies muscle and fat partition in broiler carcasses. Poult. Sci., 75, 505-513.

Appleby, M., 2004. What causes crowding? Effects of space, facilities and group size on behavior with particular reference to furnished cages for hens. Ani. Wel., 13, 313-320.

Czarick, M., Fairchild, B., 2012. Relative humidity, the best measure of overall poultry house air quality (poultry housing tips). extension article and cooperative extension service University of Georgia, (USA) 24, 2.

Daghir, N., 2009. Nutritional strategies to reduce heat stress in broilers and broiler breeders. Lohman Inform., 44, 6-15.

Dawkins, M., Donnelly, C., Jones, T., 2004. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nat., 427, 342-344.

Deaton, J., Bransto, S., Lott, B., Brake, J., 1985. Noted differences in the digestive system in caged and floor-reared commercial egg type pullets. Poult. Sci., 64, 1034-1035.

Dozier, W., Lott, B., Branton, S., 2005. Live performance of male broilers subjected to constant or increasing air velocities at moderate temperatures with a high dew point. Poult. Sci., 84, 1328-1331.

Dumm, M., Levy, M., 1949. Chemistry of the chick embryo. VII. The accumulation of solids in nitrogen, lipids, and peptidase by the gizzard and liver of the chick embryo. J. Cell. Comp. Phys., 33, 373-382.

Duncan, D., 1955. Multiple Range and Multiple F tests. Biometrics., 11, 1-42.

Estevez, I., 2007. Density allowances for broilers: Where to set the limits? . Poult. Sci., 86, 1265-1272.

Filho, D., Rosa, P., Vieira, B., Macari, M., Furlan, R., 2005. Protein levels and environmental temperature effects on carcass characteristics, performance, and nitrogen excretion of broiler chickens from 7 to 21 days of age. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic., 7.

Fouad, M., Abeer, H., Razek, A., Badawy, M., 2008. Broilers welfare and economics under two management alternatives on commercial scale. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 7, 1167-1173.

Francesch, M., Brufau, J., 2004. Nutritional factors affecting excreta/litter moisture and quality. W. Poult. Sci., 60, 64-75.

Guesdon, V., Ahmed, A., Mallet, S., Faure, J., Nys, Y., 2006. Effects of beak trimming and cage design on laying hen performance and egg quality. Briti. Poult. Sci., 47, 1-12.

Hetland, H., Svihus, B., Krogdahl, 2003. Effect of oat hulls and wood shavings on digestion in broilers and layers feed diets based on whole or ground wheat. Brit. Poult. Sci., 44, 275-282.

Howlider, M., Rose, S., 1989. Rearing temperature and the meat yield of broilers. Brit. Poult. Sci., 30, 61-67.

Iogjus, G., Stele, A., 1969. The meat production of broilers reared in batteries and deep litter. Anim. breed Abst., 37, 956.

Kao, L., Moura, D., Carvalho, T., Bueno, L., Vercellino, R., 2011. Ammonia emissions in tunnel-ventilated broiler houses. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic., 13, 4.

Kristensen, H., Wathes, C., 2000. Ammonia and poultry welfare: A review. W. Poult. Sci. J., 56, 235-245.

Leenstra, F., Cahaner, A., 1992. Lines selected for high weight gain, favorable feed conversion, and high or low fat content. Poult. Sci., Vol. 71.

Leksrisompong, N., Sanchez, R., Plumstead, P., Branan, K., Brake, J., 2007. Broiler incubation effect of elevated temperature during late incubation on body weight and organs of chicks. Poult. Sci., 86, 2685-2691.

Nicol, C., Brown, S., Glen, E., Pope, S., Short, F., Warriss, P., Zimmerman, P., Wilkins, L., 2006. Effects of stocking density flock size and management on the welfare of laying hens in single-tier aviaries. Brit. Poult. Sci., 47, 135-146.

Ratsaka, M., Ngambi, J., Ndlovu, L., 2012. Effect of potable cage rearing system and stocking density on growth, feed intake and carcass characteristics of Ross 308 broiler chickens. J. An. Sci. Adv., 2, 312-320.

Santos, F., Santos, A., Oviedo-Rondon, E., Ferket, F., 2012. Influence of housing system on growth performance and intestinal health of Salmonella challenged broiler chickens. Curr. Rese. Poult. Sci., 2, 1-10.

Schmalhusen, I., 1926. Mem. Acad. Sci. Ukraine. Class Sci. Phys., Math 2, 302-360.

Simmons, J., Lott, B., Miles, D., 2003. The effects of high air velocity on broiler performance. Poult. Sci. 82, 232-234.

Sogunle, O., Egbevale, L., Bamigboie, O., Fanimo, A., 2008. Comparison of the performance, arcasscharactrtics and hamatological parameters of broiler chicks reared in cage and floor. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 11, 480-483.

Steel, R., Torrie, J., Dickey, D., 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, McGraw-Hill; New York, USA.

Swain, B., Sundaram, R., Barbuddhe, S., Nirmale, A., 2002. Influence of cage and deep litter rearing systems on the performance of broilers. In. J. An. Sci., 79, 467-469.

Vits, A., Weitzenburger, D., Hamann, H., Distl, O., 2005. Production, egg quality, bone strength, claw length and keel bone deformities of laying hens housed in furnished cages with different group sizes. Poult. Sci., 84, 1511-1519.

Weitzenbuger, D., Vit, A., Hamann, H., Distl, O., 2005. Effect of furnished small group housing systems and furnished cages on mortality and causes of death in two layer strains. Brit. Poult. Sci., 46, 553-562.

Zhao, X., Siegel, P., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Gilbert, E., Zhu, Q., Zhang, L., 2012. Housing system affects broiler characteristics of local Chinese breed reciprocal crosses. Poult. Sci., 9, 2405-2410.

Zimmerman, P., Lindberg, A., Pope, S., Glen, E., Bolhuis, J., Nicol, C., 2006. The effect of stocking density, flock size and modified management on laying hen behavior and welfare in a non-cage system. Apl. Ani. Beh. Sci., 101, 111-124.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.