Comparing genetic diversity and population structure of common beans grown in Kyrgyzstan using microsatellites

Authors

  • Sergey Hegay Department of Agronomy, Kyrgyz National Agrarian University, Kyrgyzstan
  • Mulatu Geleta Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
  • Tomas Bryngelsson Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
  • Larisa Gustavsson Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
  • Helena Persson Hovmalm Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
  • Rodomiro Ortiz Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden

Keywords:

Common bean, Genetic diversity, Simple sequence repeats, Structure, Phaseolus vulgaris

Abstract

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an important export crop in Kyrgyzstan. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of genetic diversity, determine the population structure, and relate to the main gene pools grown in Kyrgyzstan. Twenty-eight common bean accessions (including five Kyrgyz cultivars, and main references from the Mesoamerica and South America) were evaluated with microsatellites. Nine polymorphic microsatellites were used to estimate genetic diversity and heterozygosity. The number of alleles per microsatellite locus ranged from 2 to 4 and there were a total of 24 alleles. The observed heterozygosity of each accession over all loci ranged from 0 to 1.11 (with an average of 0.05), while the expected average heterozygosity was 0.08, which could reflect the self-pollinating breeding behavior of common beans. The analysis of molecular variance further revealed that 94.71% of the total variation was accounted by differences among accessions (Fst =0.947; p<0.001). Cluster analysis grouped accessions in two gene pools: 16 belong to the Andean and 12 to the Mesoamerican gene pool. The microsatellites separated accessions in Mesoamerican gene pool from Durango and Jalisco races, which were grouped together.  We also observed that the most divergent accessions were the Kyrgyz cultivars, which may be related to the Mesoamerican races. Andean accessions were less diverse than Mesoamerican accessions in this study. This research confirms the ability of microsatellites to differentiate common bean accessions, even using a small sample size, and to be able to assign modern cultivars to their gene pools or races.

References

Ballard, L., Adams, P., Bao, Y., Bartley, D., Bintzler, D., Kasch, L., Petukhova, L., Rosato, C., 2002. Strategies for

genotyping: Effectiveness of tailing primers to increase accuracy in short tandem repeat determinations.

Biomol. Tech. 13, 20-29.

Beebe, S., Rengifo, J., Gaitan, E., Duque, M.C., Tohme, J., 2001. Diversity and origin of Andean landraces of

common bean. Crop Sci. 41, 854-862.

Beebe, S., Skroch, P.W., Tohme, J., Duque, M.C., Pedraza, F., Nienhuis, J., 2000. Structure of genetic diversity

among common bean landraces of middle American origin based on correspondence analysis of RAPD. Crop

Sci. 40, 264-273.

Blair, M.W., Cortes, A.J., Chavarro, M.C., 2011a. SNP marker diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).

Theo. App. Gen. 123, 827-845.

Blair, M.W., Diaz, L.M., Buendia, H.F., Duque, M.C., 2009. Genetic diversity, seed size associations and population

structure of a core collection of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theo. App. Genet. 119, 955-972.

Blair, M.W., Chaves, A., Tofino, A., Calderon, J.F., Palacio, J.D., 2010. Extensive diversity and inter-genepool

introgression in a worldwide collection of indeterminate snap bean accessions. Theor. App. Genet. 120, 1381-

Blair, M.W., Giraldo, M.C., Buendia, H.F., Tovar, E., Duque, M.C., Beebe, S.E., 2006. Microsatellite marker diversity

in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theo. App. Genet. 113, 100-109.

Blair, M.W., Diaz, L.M., Gill-Langarica, H.R., Rosales-Serna, R., Mayek-Perez, N., Acosta-Gallegos, J.A., 2011b.

Genetic relatedness of Mexican common bean cultivars revealed by microsatellite markers. Crop Sci. 51,

-2667.

Blair, M.W., Pedraza, F., Buendia, H.F., Gaitan-Solis, E., Beebe, S.E., Gepts, P., Tohme, J., 2003. Development of a

genome-wide anchored microsatellite map for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theo. App. Genet. 107,

-1374.

Debouck, D.G., Toro, O., Paredes, O.M., Johnson, W.C., Gepts, P., 1993. Genetic diversity and ecological

distribution of Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) in northwestern South America. Econ. Bot. 47, 408-423.

Diaz, L.M., Blair, M.W., 2006. Race structure within the Mesoamerican gene pool of common bean (Phaseolus

vulgaris L.) as determined by microsatellite markers. Theo. App. Genet. 114, 143-154.

Diaz, L.M., Buendia, H.F., Duque, M.C., Blair, M.W., 2011. Genetic diversity of Colombian landraces of common

bean as detected through the use of silver-stained and fluorescently labelled microsatellites. Plant Genet.

Res. 9, 86-96.

Duarte, J.M., dos Santos, J.B., Melo, L.C., 1999. Genetic divergence among common bean cultivars from different

races based on RAPD markers. Genet. Mol. Bio. 22, 419-426.

Earl, D.A., vonHoldt, B.M., 2012. Structure harvester: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and

implementing the Evanno method. Conser. Genet. Res. 4, 359-361.

Evans, A.M., 1976. Beans. Phaseolus spp. In N.W. Simmonds (ed.) Evol. of crop plants. Longman, London, England.

pp. 168-172.

Excoffier, L., Lischer, H.E.L., 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics

analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Eco. Res.10, 564-567.

FAO, 2010. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Accessed at

http://www.fao.org/ on May 2012.

Ferreira, J.J., Alvarez, E., Fueyo, M.A., Roca, A., Giraldez, R., 2000. Determination of the outcrossing rate of

Phaseolus vulgaris L. using seed protein markers. Euph.113, 259-263.

Geleta, M., Herrera, I., Monzón, A., Bryngelsson, T., 2012. Genetic diversity of Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) in

Nicaragua as estimated by simple sequence repeat markers. Sci. World J.pp. 1-11.

Gepts, P., Bliss, F.A., 1985. F1-hybrid weakness in the common bean - Differential geographic origin suggests two

gene pools in cultivated bean germplasm. J.of Hered. 76, 447-450.

Gepts, P., Osborn, T.C., Rashka, K., Bliss, F.A., 1986. Phaseolin-protein variability in wild forms and landraces of the

common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Evidence for multiple centers of domestication. Econ. Bot. 40, 451-468.

Hanai, L.R., Santini, L., Camargo, L.E.A., Fungaro, M.H.P., Gepts, P., Tsai, S.M., Vieira, M.L.C., 2010. Extension of the

core map of common bean with EST-SSR, RGA, AFLP, and putative functional markers. Mol. Breed. 25, 25-45.

Kaplan, L.,1981. What is the origin of the common bean? Econ. Bot. 35, 240-254.

Koenig, R., Gepts, P., 1989. Allozyme diversity in wild Phaseolus vulgaris: further evidence for two major centers of

genetic diversity. Theo. App. Gen. 78, 809-817.

Nei, M., 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals.

Genet. 89, 583-590.

Page, R.D.M., 1996. TREEVIEW. An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computer. Comp. App. in

the Biosci. 12, 357-358.

Pavlicek, A., Hrda, S., Flegr, J., 1999. FreeTree-freeware program for construction of phylogenetic trees on the

basis of distance data and bootstrap jackknife analysis of the tree robustness. Application in the RAPD

analysis of genus Frenkelia. Folia Bio. 45, 97-99.

Pritchard, J.K., Stephens, M., Donnelly, P., 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Genet. 155, 945-959.

Rohlf, F.J., 2000. NTSYS-pc: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Setanket, New York.

Rosenberg, N.A., 2004. DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol. Eco. Notes. 4,

-138.

Singh, S.P., 1988. Gene pools in cultivated dry bean. Ann. Rep. Bean Imp. Coop. 31, 180-182.

Singh, S.P., Urrea, C.A., 1990. Variation for bracteoles and its association with races of common bean. Ann. Rep.

Bean Imp. Coop. 33, 112.

Singh, S.P., Nodari, R., Gepts, P., 1991a. Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean. 1. Allozymes. Crop Sci. 31,

-23.

Singh, S.P., Gepts, P., Debouck, D.G., 1991b. Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ. Bot. 45,

-396.

Tohme, J., Gonzalez, D.O., Beebe, S., Duque, M.C., 1996. AFLP analysis of gene pools of a wild bean core collection.

Crop Sci. 36, 1375-1384.

Urrea, C.A., Singh, S.P., 1991. Variation for leaflet shape in wild and cultivated landraces of common bean. Ann.

Rep. Bean Imp. Coop. 34, 133.

Vavilov, N.I., 1926. Studies on the origin of cultivated plants. Bull. of Appl. Bot. and Plant Breed. (Leningrad). 16, 1-

Warwick, S.I., Gugel, R.K., 2003. Genetic variation in the Crambe abyssinica - C. hispanica - C. glabrata complex.

Genet. Res. and Crop Evol. 50, 291-305.

Yeh, F.C., Boyle, T.J.B., 1997. Population genetic analysis of codominant and dominant markers and quantitative

traits. Belg. J. of Bot. 129, 157.

Yu, K.F., Park, S.J., Poysa, V., 1999. Abundance and variation of microsatellite DNA sequences in beans (Phaseolus

and Vigna). Genome. 42, 27-34.

Zhang, X.Y., Blair, M.W., Wang, S.M., 2008. Genetic diversity of Chinese common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

landraces assessed with simple sequence repeat markers. Theo. App. Genet. 117, 629-640.

Published

2012-11-25

How to Cite

Hegay, S. ., Geleta, M. ., Bryngelsson, T. ., Gustavsson, L. ., Persson Hovmalm, H. ., & Ortiz, R. . (2012). Comparing genetic diversity and population structure of common beans grown in Kyrgyzstan using microsatellites. Scientific Journal of Veterinary Advances, 1(4), 63-75. Retrieved from http://sjournals.com/index.php/sjva/article/view/1232

Issue

Section

Original Article