Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Cover Image

Exposition of the constituents of a disharmonious learning situation within an orthodidactic context

Patrick Sibanda

Abstract


The purpose of this review was to examine the constituents of a disharmonious learning situation in the context of orthodidactic practice with a view of demonstrating how each one effectively contributes to a disharmonious learning environment. The motivation behind this thrust was that future reviews or research will focus on how these constituents can be best managed. The review established six main constituents namely disharmonious pedagogical relationship, incorrectly anticipated lesson plans, inadequate actualisation of cognitive potentialities, deficient learning effect, lived experience of being different and affective distress. A literature review exposed that these are intractably related to the manifestations of learning difficulties. As such the ensuing literature analysis revealed that the constituents of a disharmonious learning situation, in effect, present themselves as a result of lack of synchrony between and among the essences of the lesson structure coupled with the dynamics of the social interrelationships that characterize the teaching/ learning environment. From the analysis, it was concluded that the constituents of a disharmonious learning situation are at the core of the pedagogy of learning difficulties and therefore are the central focus of orthodidactics as a science of helping a child in distress. The constituents further suggest that a disharmonious learning situation is not only about the child needing help but also about a need to capacitate the teacher to be able to offer effective help to the child in distress.

References


Baumeister, R.F., Vohs, K.D., De Wall, C.N., Zhang, L., 2007. How emotion shapes behaviour. Feedback, anticipation and reflection rather than direct causation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev., 11(2), 167-203.

Broekens, J., Jacobs, E., Jonker, C.M., 2015. A reinforcement learning model of joy, distress, hope and fear. Connect. Sci., 27(3).

De Fever, F., 2006. An orthopedagogical method for children with a depression. Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ., 262-274.

DSF Literacy and Clinical Services, 2014. Learning difficulties. The difference between a learning difficulty and a learning disability. www.dsf.net.au

Du Toit, A.S., 1978. Learning difficulties. An attempted redefinition and resulting future task for orthodidactic. S. Afr. J. Pedagog., 12(1), 58-78.

Du Toit, A.S., 1978. The disharmonious teaching situation. Guidelines for Orthodidactic Practice. S. Afr. J. Pedagog., 3(2), 27-39.

Du Toit, A.S., 1984. Learning problems. An Educational Perspective. Johannesburg, Rand Afrikaans University.

Institute of Mental Health, 2014. Learning difficulties. Singapore: IMH.

National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities, 1990. www.Idonline.org

Pretorious, J.M.W., 1999. Childlike lived experiences. A Psychological Pedagogical Study. Johannesburg: Perskor.

Starling, J., 2010. Learning difficulties. Learning Difficulties Coalition: Canberra.

Van der Merwe, C.A., 1999. The retarded child’s actualisation of intelligence. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.

Van Niekerk, P.A., 1979. The orthopedagogical within the pedagogical. S. Afr. J. Pedagog., 13(1), 183-191.

Van Niekerk, P.A., 1985. Die onderwyser en die kind met problem. Stellonbosch: Universiteitsuitgewers en-Boekhanderlaars.

Van Niekerk, P.A., 1990. An educational perspective on street children. J. Pedagog., 11(2), 90-103.

Van Niekerk, P.A., Van der Stoep, M.C.H., Sonnekeus, G.V., Ferreira, J.W.M., Pretorious, A.S., Du Toit, A.M., Visser, E.C., Kellerman, S.E., Oliver, H.J.T., 1999. Helping children with learning problems. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.